Bring your own account
The platform has no provider account of its own. That one design decision changes who owns the numbers, who holds the quota, and who appears on the invoice.
Read the guide →Delivery receipts and inbound replies are different endpoints, configured in different places in your provider’s console. Configure only the receipt URL and opt-out handling stops — silently, with no error anywhere.
Outbound outcomes arrive at the receipt URL. Replies from recipients — including STOP — arrive at the inbound URL. They are separate paths and, in most provider consoles, separate configuration screens under different headings.
This is the single most common way to lose opt-out handling. Receipts keep working, the message log looks healthy, and the suppression list simply never receives any entries. Nothing reports a fault, because from the provider’s point of view nothing is wrong.
| Direction | Path | Configured under |
|---|---|---|
| Outbound outcome | /webhook/sms/{provider} | Delivery receipts / DLR |
| Inbound reply | /webhook/sms/{provider}/inbound | Inbound messages |
The token in the URL identifies which account the event belongs to. It does not prove that the event genuinely came from the provider — per-provider signature verification is not implemented. Treat the inbound endpoint as authenticated by obscurity of the token, and treat provider signatures as something to verify yourself if your risk model needs it.
The platform has no provider account of its own. That one design decision changes who owns the numbers, who holds the quota, and who appears on the invoice.
Read the guide →SMS is billed per segment, not per message. Whether your text fits in one segment depends on the character set it needs — and on the encoding you set on the connection.
Read the guide →Opt-out is two halves: the suppression record, and the check that runs before a marketing message is handed to the provider. Both run through one shared normalisation, which is the part that usually breaks.
Read the guide →A receipt is a sequence of states, not a verdict. Treating an intermediate one as final is the most common way a sending dashboard ends up lying to you.
Read the guide →Every connection carries a send rate. The platform queues to that rate instead of firing as fast as a provider will accept, because the fastest way to get throttled is to send at the speed that causes it.
Read the guide →Routes are ordered by priority and weighted within a connection. The point of the arrangement is that a provider rejecting sends degrades into slower sending, not into silence.
Read the guide →The platform asks you to declare what kind of message you are sending instead of inferring it from the text. That one field decides whether the opt-out gate applies — and the honesty of the declaration is yours.
Read the guide →Sending is accepted asynchronously and there is no de-duplication key. Retrying a request you are unsure about sends a second message and bills for it.
Read the guide →A recipient who opted out can opt back in. The platform deactivates the suppression record rather than deleting it, so the consent trail survives.
Read the guide →Terminal outcomes are pushed to a URL you control, with a small bounded retry. Your handler has to tolerate a repeat, and it should not expect a call for every message.
Read the guide →There are two throttles in front of a send: the one your plan sets, and a much higher one at the network edge. Both answer with the same status code, so the message text is what tells them apart.
Read the guide →If you do not name a sender, the platform picks one from the connection that carries the message. Naming one explicitly takes priority everywhere.
Read the guide →Message content is not archived. What is kept is metadata — and among that metadata two fields are load-bearing, because without them a bill could not be reconciled.
Read the guide →